For Money or Love Essay example -- Literary Analysis, Jane Austen

Women of the 1800’s where very limited to what they could do in life; especially the women of the upper and middle class. They where expected to do nothing more than marry and to marry well. If they could not do this the life that they faced was very grim. It would be a life of spinsterhood and being care for by other family members or working as a governess for some upper class family. Jane Austen in her book Pride and Prejudice shows the reader the important of marrying and hopefully marrying well but also how important it is marry for love. Jane Austen was born in1775 and the world that she grows up in was one that was very limited for women. Jane was very lucky in the fact that her parents knew how important an education was for all children. She was sent to school but she received most of her education at home from the book in her father’s library. From David Nokes’s book â€Å"Jane Austen a Life† he tells us that Jane† had determined that whatever her fait might be she would not indulge the role of charming female imbecile.†(103) and she was not willing to marry someone she did not love. In her book, she shows us many different characters and how they go about the whole game of marriage. There are five relationships in the book that we will look at, Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, Mr. and Mrs. Gardiner, Charlotte Lucas and Mr. Collins, Lydia and Wickham, Jane and Bingley, and Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. Mrs. Bennett is described in the book as being a women of mean understanding, little information, and uncertain temper. (3) She was a women with five daughters and her goal in life was to see them all married and hopefully married well. In understanding Pride and Prejudice, Debra Teachman suggests that â€Å"Mrs. Bennet does not have the... ...s not have very many options in life and that by marry him she would bring security to her mother and sisters but she is not willing to marry without being in love. If all she wanted was to marry for money she would have accepted Mr. Darcy first proposal instead of telling him â€Å"that you were the last man in the world whom I could ever be prevailed on to marry.† For Darcy and Elizabeth to fall in love it takes time and the understanding of each other charter before they both can look be on their own Pride and Prejudice that they might have. Jane Austen is trying to show us that marriage is more that a business deal and that one should not just look to the good manners or appetence of another. That marriage with love is domed to be unhappy and that does not take a lot of money to find happiness. I believe that she put a lot of herself in to the charter Elizabeth.

Malawi Less Developed Countries Essay

Malawi is one of the world’s poorest countries, ranking 160th out of 182 countries on the Human Development Index. Progress towards reaching the Millennium Development Goal of eradicating extreme poverty has been limited. According to the United Nations Development Programme’s Human Development Report for 2009, about 74 per cent of the population still lives below the income poverty line of US$1.25 a day and 90 per cent below the US$2 a day threshold. The proportion of poor and ultra-poor is highest in rural areas of the southern and northern parts of the country. Country indicators GDP per capita average annual growth rate (%), 1990-2012 1.2 Underweight (%) 2008-2012*, moderate & severe 12.8 Secondary school participation, Net attendance ratio (%) 2008-2012*, male 9.7 Secondary school participation, Net attendance ratio (%) 2008-2012*, female 10.4 GNI per capita 2012, US$ 320 Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above) 74.77 Infant mortality rate 71 HDI( human development index) 0.388 All these indicators show Malawi is a LDC according to the UN criteria for the identification of an LDC. Reason for the low levels of development in Malawi Despite the availability of better technologies, the productivity of most crops has not improved since the 1970s, largely as a result of declining soil fertility. Also contributing to the low yields are poor access to financial services and markets, unfavourable weather, small landholdings and  nutrient-depleted soils, coupled with limited use of fertilizers. The use of improved varieties, together with fertilizers, better crop husbandry and irrigation, has the potential to greatly improve yields. Post-harvest losses are estimated to be around 40 per cent of production. The recurrence of shocks frustrates attempts to escape rural poverty. The most common shocks are weather-related, such as crop failures and increases in the price of food. Illness or injury is also very common, as are shocks associated with death of family members, heightened by the HIV/AIDS epidemic, which has affected 11.9 per cent of the population. Shocks often force households to sell assets, thereby undermining their ability to engage in productive activities. As a result, poor households have to adopt costly coping strategies such as selling assets, withdrawing children from school and reducing food consumption. Poor rural people in Malawi are unable to diversify out of agriculture and tend to remain underemployed for part of the year. More than a third of rural households earn their livelihood only from farming or fishing. An additional 25 per cent combine work on their farm with other jobs, largely in agriculture. Other income sources tend to be limited to poorly paid agricultural labour. Few economic opportunities combined with the marked seasonality of rainfed agriculture leads to labour shortages during the critical phases of the cropping season, with underemployment for the rest of the year. Access to education, a major driver of relative wealth, is highly inequitable as well. Almost 30 per cent of poor children do not even start primary school, which is free in Malawi. Secondary and higher education is largely confined to non-poor households, mainly due to the required enrolment fees. Limited access to markets and services is another constraint. Poor rural people tend to live in remote areas with few roads and means of transport, which limits their economic opportunities. Access to financial services is severely restricted, especially for smallholder farmers. Only 12 per cent of households have access to credit. What is being done to tackle Malawi’s problems? In May 2002, the Government launched the Malawi Poverty Reduction Strategy (MPRS), with the goal of achieving â€Å"sustainable poverty reduction through empowerment of the poor† over a three-year period. The MPRS achieved a modest decline in poverty levels while real gross domestic product (GDP)  growth averaged only 1.5 per cent per annum. In 2005, the MPRS was reformulated as the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS), which remains the overarching policy framework for social and economic development. Under the MGDS, real GDP growth for 2006-09 averaged 8.4 per cent and is expected to continue to be strong, helped by increased revenue from mining. While growth was somewhat lower during 2009-10, it seems that Malawi will weather the global financial crisis. The fiscal deficit has been brought down, and debt relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative has greatly reduced the burden of debt service. Notwithstanding good recent performance, the a bility to maintain a level of economic growth to ensure poverty reduction remains limited by: ï‚ §the narrow economic base; ï‚ §the small domestic market; ï‚ §poor infrastructure/high transport costs; ï‚ §erratic power supply and heavy reliance on energy imports; ï‚ §the presence of the State in the business sector; ï‚ §Government intervention in key markets; ï‚ §and weak management capacity in the public and private sectors. Agriculture provides over 80 per cent of exports and contributes some 34 per cent to GDP; services make up 46 per cent of GDP and industry 20 per cent. The performance of agriculture is therefore critical for the economy. Average growth in the sector is highly dependent on climatic factors, and reached nearly 7 per cent during the 1990s and 9 per cent between 2002 and 2006, with a drop to -9 per cent in the 2005 drought. Growth has subsequently recovered with improved seasonal conditions, boosted by the Farm Input Subsidy Programme. The Farm Input Subsidy Programme was launched in 2005-06 to increase agricultural production and ensure food security, by providing government-subsidized agricultural inputs to smallholding farmers. The scheme has coincided with a significant jump in maize production, although it is unclear how much of this is attributable to the subsidy and how much to improved seasonal conditions. The subsidy programme is now a firmly established pillar of agricultural policy. However, it presents a number of policy dilemmas: †¢the cost of the programme is so high that most  other initiatives have to be sidelined, including the extension and research services needed to ensure optimal use of the inputs; †¢the programme has tended to displace commercial input purchases by farmers; and the distribution of inputs has tended to favour the more food-secure households.

Nuclear weapons in the world - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 887 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/08/16 Category Security Essay Level High school Tags: Nuclear Weapons Essay Did you like this example? Nuclear weapons should be entirely removed from all countries because it doesnt help anybody in anyway. The only outcome of using nuclear power is death and destruction. The negative effects of nuclear weapons go on and on. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Nuclear weapons in the world" essay for you Create order The death toll of this power would be in the millions and everyone that was involved in the war would be almost completely wiped out. The countries that have these weapons are North Korea, Israel, India, Pakistan, the United Kingdom, China, France, the United States, and Russia. The United States and Russia have a larger supply of nuclear weapons compared to the other countries. The United States has roughly has 6,550 nuclear weapons and Russia has roughly around 6,800. Countries that have nuclear weapons feel protected and do not want to give them up. Getting rid of all nuclear weapons is flawed because there are so many countries that have them. Some countries use the fact that they have nuclear force as power for their country. We have a way to â€Å"restrict† nuclear power from countries by putting nuclear sanctions on them. Nuclear Sanctions are a way of controlling the use of nuclear power for defence of their countries. The countries that have these sanctions include Cuba, North Korea, Iran, and Russia. What it means when a country gets a sanction on them it is a â€Å"threatened penalty for disobeying a law or rule.† Not just one country can put a sanction on another the United Nations must come together and discuss the problem and decide whether or not to put a sanction the country. Putting these sanctions on these countries cause many tensions to arise. North Korea has threatened to Enable there nuclear weapons if the U.S. does not remove their sanction on them. The leader of Russia Vladimir Putin has called the U.S. sanction on North Korea useless, and he stated that â€Å" They would rather eat grass than give up their nuclear programme. The UNODC (United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs) has a number of multilateral treaties against nuclear force; the treaties include the, Treaty o n the Non Proliferation of Nuclear weapons which bans testing of nuclear weapons in space or underwater the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban treaty which was sign in 1966 but has not been applied yet, and the Treaty of the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons which was able to be signed in 2017 but has also not been applied yet. These treaties and sanction need to be enforced and applied before tensions become to much and millions die and the environment gets destroyed The after effect of a nuclear war would be catastrophic. One of the worse things that comes out of nuclear force is the after effect; Radiation will spread through the area that was targeted. When the bomb would first be dropped, the impact would cause you be disintegrated, the thermal radiation exposure. When you are exposed to ionizing radiation which is the radiation involved in nuclear weapons it can lead a lot of bad symptoms which include cancer, reducing of cardiac functions, nausea, bloody diarrhea, bloody vomiting, skin will burn and you and lesions will be vulnerable to infections. The radiation from the nuclear weapons is so strong that if you are directly hit by it wouldnt hurt because the radiation would burn off the pain nerves. If you were to survive that the only way to treat this is to amputate the infected area. Radiation can also cause birth defects, babies that are in the development stages of 2 to 18 weeks have been common to get brain defects, growth stunts, and mental retardation. When the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima in 1945, there seemed to be shadows the people that were literally vaporized from the immense heat from the explosion. The question is how would we recover from a nuclear fallout? We all know that if a WW3 were to happen that the planet would be almost uninhabitable because of the amount of heat and radiation. If a Nuclear war would happen then, billions of Kgs of smoke and dust would will the atmosphere which would cause food shortages from the plants not getting the amount of sunlight that is need and it would cool the earth down enough for the plants to not be able to grow. If there were to be survivors on this fall out they would wish they were not alive as they would die from cancers or mutations from the radiation. The air you would breathe would be like poison from the number of chemicals in the air; the water would be contaminated and so will the plants and animals. Overall this would be a lose lose situation for everyone involved. There would be no reason for a war like this to happen, it has no positives and the only outcome is death a destruction. No one will win and there will be billions of innocent people and animal that will be caught in the crossfire. Albert Einstein once said.â€Å"I know not with what weapons World war III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.† This quote explains that if there is a WW3 than there will be nothing left in the world and that we will have to start over. WW3 will be our meteor, and we are the dinosaurs.